this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Conservative

383 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The latest IRS data on who bears the income tax burden demonstrate yet again the benefits of lower tax rates over higher rates.

When President Donald Trump entered office, the richest 1% of tax filers ($675,000 income and above) paid a little more than 40% of the income taxes collected.

The 2017 Trump tax cut reduced the effective highest federal tax rate to 37% from 42%.

But the most recent IRS tax return data (for 2021) confirm that even as these rates were lowered — not to mention the corporate tax rate cut from 35% to 21% — the share of the tax burden shouldered by the 1% rose to almost 46%.

Written by the guy who came up with the Laffer Curve, Arthur Laffer.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Better source

I think you forgot to include it in your heap of garbage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you able to offer anything other than dismissive labels?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sure. But why would I bother when I know you're just going to keep spamming your usual slop regardless?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why do you two just go in circles all the time? Why not just Ignore each other?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Because just letting disinformation go unchecked is overall bad for the community

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

You're not checking anything. You're just saying "that's [label]"

Possible labels:

  • slop

  • garbage

  • drivel

  • etc

To actually counter disinformation you have to actually explain why it is disinformation. Or else all you're doing is a one man circlejerk.