Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54565 readers

472 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

402

Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu (overkill.wtf)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New documents filed Monday, February 26 reveal that videogame giant Nintendo is taking action against the creators of the popular emulator tool Yuzu.

The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).

Nintendo alleges that Tropic Haze's free Yuzu emulator tool unlawfully allows pirated Switch games to be played on PCs and other devices, bypassing Nintendo's protection measures.

The official Yuzu website suggests that the tool is to be used with software you yourself own: "You are legally required to dump your games from your Nintendo Switch" — but it's common knowledge, that this is not how these tools are primarily used.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think @[email protected] made a solid point here.

Nintendo goes after those that make money. That includes ROM sites too. For example, Nintendo didn't sue Dolphin developers, they told Valve to take down their software. Please correct me if I am wrong.

I am not saying that Nintendo goes only after those that make money but maybe a money papertrail takes away the anonymousness of the internet. Bank accounts makes finding people a whole lot easier.

[+] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It is when the product is using their IP to violate copyright laws.

I fully support emulators and pirating, but I don't lie to myself about it being legal or ethical.

[+] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If you read the lawsuit Nintendo is suing because Yuzu acknowledges their software can't run without the Switch's decryption keys. Yuzu also has instructions to extract the decryption keys on their website. So Yuzu is not completely reverse engineering how the Switch runs games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

because Yuzu acknowledges their software can’t run without the Switch’s decryption keys.

That's a failure on the DMCA, not on Yuzu.

The law clearly establishes the protection by which you are allowed to make a personal backup copy. Yuzy thus should by design allow you to play this backup copy, as would any other emulator that actually did its job. If you need to break DRM in order to get your own keys to play your personal copy in the first place, it's not Yuzu's fault, it's a DMCA provision that has been put n place without forethought on how it clashes against the use provision.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago

Oh please, that's the same argument of, "It's not a bong, it's a tobacco pipe." Yeah, they might call it that to circumvent the law, but everyone knows damn well that 99% of users aren't using it for that.

They're profiting off selling a tool that breaks encryption and bypasses copyright protections. The profit is the issue here.

While I support their efforts, I can also realize that Nintendo absolutely has a right to try to stop them, and it's not unethical for them to do so.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Amorally, probably. Ilegally? No, they are not.