this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence

2889 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Free Open-Source Artificial Intelligence!

We are a community dedicated to forwarding the availability and access to:

Free Open Source Artificial Intelligence (F.O.S.A.I.)

More AI Communities

LLM Leaderboards

Developer Resources

GitHub Projects

FOSAI Time Capsule

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1
US is seeking public opinion on regulating open source AI (www.commerce.gov)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This would be a good opportunity to provide a thoughtful, sane, and coherent response to voice your opinion on the future regulation policies for AI to counter the fearmongering.

How to submit a comment: https://www.regulations.gov/document/NTIA-2023-0009-0001

All electronic public comments on this action, identified by Regulations.gov docket number NTIA–2023–0009, may be submitted through the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. The docket established for this request for comment can be found at www.Regulations.gov, NTIA–2023–0009. To make a submission, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. Additional instructions can be found in the “Instructions” section below, after “Supplementary Information.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Am American, am not particularly tech savvy. Can anyone recommend a reliable resource to read more about this? Are there any nonprofit or foss groups that are likely to have a published position on how AI should be regulated?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Well the open source community should have a near zero unified opinion on how a broad technology should be centrally managed. Individual groups or persons should hold their own positions.

This is like saying binary search, or encryption should be regulated. LLM is just a particular technology. A fundamental thing. It's just math and systems.

Products and derivates may be another thing (like Perhaps creating deepfakes of living people, for example, or training a model on copyright material)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

The EFF has published some suggestions in the past, I’d generally trust their perspective.