this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4089 readers
11 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

UK government agencies, think tanks, businesses and charities also appear in the leaked i-Soon data.

Other documents hint at successful hacks of public bodies and businesses across Asia and Europe, but it is not yet clear if any were compromised.

The identity of the leaker is unknown.

i-Soon is one of many private companies that provide cyber security services for China's military, police and security services.

It employs less than 25 staff at its Shanghai headquarters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

China claims a LOT of things. Poor paper tiger 'country'.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

When it comes to hacking, China is very capable. Along with the US, Russia and even North Korea (no, really), they are the main state actors.

However these days zero day exploits are more often written by private contractors (a lot in Argentina, for some reason) and then sold to nation states on discrete markets, rather than written by state actors themselves. It wasn't the NSA who gave the FBI the ability to unlock an iPhone when they couldn't compel Apple to do so through the courts.