this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
1 points (53.8% liked)
Stable Diffusion Art
1838 readers
70 users here now
Share art created with Stable Diffusion
Also see:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That isn't an AI ruling though. That just upholds the existing precedent that non-humans can't hold copyright.
If you refuse to read the ruling, then I don’t know why you’re even arguing.
This has nothing to do with the guidance we are talking about.
A judge’s ruling is not guidance, it’s precedent.
This precedent has nothing to the guidance you were referring to in your first message.
If you refuse to read the ruling, then I don’t know why you’re even arguing.
I've explained it to you enough times. I'm done. Don't message me again.
If you refuse to read the ruling, then I don’t know why you’re even arguing.