this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
-1 points (46.2% liked)
Linux
2359 readers
10 users here now
Shit, just linux.
Use this community for anything related to linux for now, if it gets too huge maybe there will be some sort of meme/gaming/shitpost spinoff. Currently though… go nuts
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I expected people have tried to move files... using the move command.
I did not expect I'd have to specify that there's a destination, in an explanation of what
*.jpg
does, not an explanation of whatmv
does.For clarity:
GNU bash, version 5.0.17(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
mv *.jpg /mnt/Example/Pictures
Where it will then die with an error like
mv: invalid option -- '1'
depending on the contents of the current directory.Every search about this has led back to this StackOverflow page sooner or later. All answers address wildcard expansion.
When I run into situations like this, I use the commands that work to write out a script. Eg, in your case the wildcard isn't working with the mv command, so do something like this:
ls -1 *.jpg | awk '{print "mv ""$1"" /mnt/example/Pictures"}' > /tmp/movefiles.sh
Then check the movefiles.sh and make sure it has all of the commands and files properly stated, make that executable, and then run that.
ls | grep | mv
would work, except the StackOverflow discussion also highlights how parsing ls can have the same issues.I am moving thousands of files at once. If I have to check each one, it's still wrong.
The pragmatic answer turns out to be
./*
instead of*
.I saw that answer and was just offering another option. I am sure xargs might work, but you would need to test as you need a destination passed on each line. Back to my way, I have used it for a lot more than just the move command. I think I used it to do a chmod once where I wanted to check and make sure before I committed to actually running the command(s). You could also use find and the -exec option, which I think was also mentioned here.
Edit: also, you wouldn't need to check each one, just the first few and last few to make sure the syntax is correct. Maybe do a wc -l to make sure it's got the right number of entries and then let it run.
Can you run
printf %s\\n *.jpg
in that same directory and share the result? I'm really intrigued. If there's private information in there, I'd be satisfied with just a handful of lines showing the issue with private info replaced with ****sEdit: also run
alias mv
to check whether you have an alias messing things upbash: alias: mv: not found
printf %s\\n *.jpg
is just a list of filenames on newlines. There's 75,000 of them. You'll have to take my word for it.Fortunately, GenderNeutralBro's aside about using
./*
instead of*
works as expected. Could have been files beginning with_-
. None begin with-
, exactly.