this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
83 points (92.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40347 readers
381 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

About a year ago I switched to ZFS for Proxmox so that I wouldn't be running technology preview.

Btrfs gave me no issues for years and I even replaced a dying disk with no issues. I use raid 1 for my Proxmox machines. Anyway I moved to ZFS and it has been a less that ideal experience. The separate kernel modules mean that I can't downgrade the kernel plus the performance on my hardware is abysmal. I get only like 50-100mb/s vs the several hundred I would get with btrfs.

Any reason I shouldn't go back to btrfs? There seems to be a community fear of btrfs eating data or having unexplainable errors. That is sad to hear as btrfs has had lots of time to mature in the last 8 years. I would never have considered it 5-6 years ago but now it seems like a solid choice.

Anyone else pondering or using btrfs? It seems like a solid choice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What seems dated in its architecture? Last time I looked at it, it struck me as pretty modern compared to what's in use today.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It doesn't share well. Anytime anything IO heavy happens the system completely locks up.

That doesn't happen on other systems

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That doesn't speak much of the architecture. Also it's really odd. Not denying what you're seeing is happening, just that it seems odd based on the setups I run with ZFS. My main server is in fact a shared machine that I use as a workstation and games along as a server. All works in parallel. I used to have a mirror, then a 4-disk RAIDz and now an 8-disk RAIDz2. I have multiple applications constantly using the pool. I don't notice any performance slowdowns on the desktop, or in-game when IO goes high. The only time I notice anything is when something like multiple Plex transcoders hit the CPU hard. Sequential performance is around 1.3GB/s which is limited by the data bus speeds (USB DAS boxes). Random performance is very good although I don't have any numbers out of my head. I'm using mostly WD Elements shucked disks and a couple of IronWolfs. No enterprise grade disks on this system.

I'm also not saying that you have to keep fucking around with it instead of going Btrfs. Simply adding another anecdote to the picture. If I had a serious problem like that and couldn't figure it out I'd be on LVMRAID+Ext4 which is what used prior to ZFS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah maybe my machines are cursed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt that. Some options:

  • bad memory
  • failing drives
  • silent CPU faults
  • poor power delivery

The list is endless. Maybe BTRFS is more tolerant of the problems you're facing, but that doesn't mean the problems are specific to ZFS. I recommend doing a bit of testing to see if everything looks fine on the HW side of things (memtest, smart tests, etc).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I set the Arc cache to 4GB and it is working better now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is totally possible. I spent a month changing boards and CPUs to fix a curse on my main, unrelated to storage. In case you're curious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I feel like this one flew right over my head. 🥹