Privacy

32054 readers

1029 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

358

Modern cars are surveillance devices on wheels with major privacy risks – new report (theconversation.com)

submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

New research reveals serious privacy flaws in the data practices of new internet connected cars in Australia. It’s yet another reason why we need urgent reform of privacy laws.

Modern cars are increasingly equipped with internet-enabled features. Your “connected car” might automatically detect an accident and call emergency services, or send a notification if a child is left in the back seat.

But connected cars are also sophisticated surveillance devices. The data they collect can create a highly revealing picture of each driver. If this data is misused, it can result in privacy and security threats.

A report published today analysed the privacy terms from 15 of the most popular new car brands that sell connected cars in Australia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

I find it hard to believe that Google phones wouldn't have a hardware±SIM backdoor no matter what ROM is installed.

This technology already was in place on Intel ME desktops using a operating system on a chip called MINIX

That and phones far exceed surveillance perfection and device count vs PC.

Anything not RISCV and with a binary blob is a vector.