this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
370 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2852 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Australian senators censured Senator Lidia Thorpe for her outburst against King Charles III during his visit, calling him a colonizer and demanding land and reparations. Thorpe defended her actions, stating she would repeat them if Charles returned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

They are not independent. They are under the rule of the crown. 4-5 years ago the governor of Australia, who reports to the crown, dissolved parliament.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

The G-G dissolves parliament every time the Prime Minister (PM) advises them to do so. I think you don't grok the situation here, constitutionally speaking.

  1. The King (or Queen) of Australia has powers defined in our constitution. They can't issue commands at will.
  2. The King appoints the Governor-General (GG) on the advice of the PM
  3. The King delegates their powers to the GG
  4. The GG acts on the advice of the PM, to approve legislation (royal assent), and to dissolve parliament when the time comes. Also, awarding honors and some other non-political stuff. Head of state duties like greeting and hosting other heads of state.
  5. The GG does not seek permission or even advice from the King. Delegation of powers doesn't mean the GG may exercise those powers, it means they must exercise those powers. That's an important difference.
  6. There are reserve powers, "break glass only in emergency" powers. One of those is to sack the government. It's happened once in living memory, in 1975, when the elected government couldn't pass funding bills and the government was about to run out of money (sound familiar?). That's one of the few triggers where the reserve powers can be used. They can't be used for just anything. Sacking the government also means a full election, upper and lower house.
  7. The GG doesn't report to the crown (King or Queen) in the sense you mean. There's no "list of things I did today" and the King then sends back an "approved" stamp.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 hours ago

He dissolved parliament based on what rules written by whom, on whose orders?

Hint hint: Based on the Australian constitution, written by Australians, on the order (well, "advice", same thing in this case) of the Australian Prime Minister.