this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
536 points (99.3% liked)

memes

10309 readers
2221 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I have 4 DL360s with 96GB RAM each to run a K8s cluster with a handful of containers

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I have 4 DL360s with 96GB RAM each to run a K8s cluster with a handful of containers

If someone is paying you to host those and covering your costs, go wild! However, as a hobby you may be spending $925/year or more for electricity to run those in the Midwest. $1,387 if you're living in Boston, $1,850 if you're living in California.

In one year you may have been able to buy more new power efficient hardware from just what you're spending on juice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Curious how you calculated that? What system load is it based on? Idle? Max?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Curious how you calculated that? What system load is it based on? Idle? Max?

Very much an estimate because OP didn't mention what generation DL360 they had, how many CPUs, drives, etc. So I assumed 120W continuous 24/7/365 consumption which is pretty low. Assuming 22 cents per KWh for midwest, 33 cents/KWh for Boston and 44 cents/KWh for California.

OP is likely drawing much more than my estimate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Seems realistic. Thanks for the details.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)