Ask Lemmygrad

808 readers

5 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What's up with people claiming PSL shields predators? [CW: mentions of SA] (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is there any veracity to the claim that "the PSL covered up SA allegations"? I hear it constantly from people who are opposed to the PSL. I wanna know if this is just an attempt at smearing them or an actual valid concern

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a clarification :p we aren't necessarily friendly (or unfriendly) to any party, but we also can only write about what we can back up. In the case of PSL's controversy section ref 14 is a huge repository of many primary accounts, though I haven't followed their own links, but I would start with that catalog as it has tons more links that I saw

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the clarification!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I forgot to mention it also comes down to who edits a page and what they want to say. We know for example from someone who tried out with PSL that they're not great at all on indigenous issues (but no party is in the US) but they haven't got around to editing that in.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Fair enough!