World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Not anymore, but their original charter cites the verse. That spirit obviously lives on in the modern militant movement, because they've been killing civilians even after the apparent "reforms."
The reason these haven't happened at the same scale is because Israel is quite capable of fighting off its attackers. If Hamas and Hezbollah had the same military quality that Israel has, Israel wouldn't exist today.
But also according to you:
Which is it?
Do you prefer this source written by Michael Georgy, an Egyptian correspondent? Egypt is no friend of America. Also, is this American propaganda? Or is it only American propaganda when it says something you don't like?
Tell you what. Here's a few more pieces showing Hamas hiding behind the veil of civilian garb and infrastructure: One; Two; Three; Four. It's obviously been a part of their strategy. Do you think it's changed? If so, why?
The article states:
So it wasn't rockets specifically, but still weapons. And the building was vacant because it was evacuated. Why are you getting caught up on semantics like this but missing other major details in the same article?
Actually, the quote I mentioned with that link to The Guardian references Al-Aqsa TV, which is run by Hamas. Based on his author page, Peter Beaumont is not a paid shill of the IDF. Or again, is it only hostile propaganda when it argues against Hamas's indiscriminate killings?
According to the Palestinian Authority, aid is being stolen by Hamas and sold to civilians at very high prices. Given that the article describes them congratulating Hamas on the October 7th attack, I don't think they're being paid off by Israel when they say this. Either way, Hamas's theft of aid is contributing to the ongoing conditions there.
Would it be better if they didn't order an evacuation at all? That would get a lot more Palestinians killed, and would result in an even more severe genocide. Or would you rather they enter into urban combat against a foe that hides behind civilians and stores weapons in civilian buildings? Or should they simply lie down and accept Hamas shooting up their citizens and firing off indiscriminate rockets into their territory?
This line along with the whole "October 7th isn't as bad as you seem to think" thing has big "it didn't happen but they deserved it" vibes.
A charter that was rewritten 8 years ago to clarify its position. The old one is no longer relevant.
They didn't kill them because they were Jews. It was because they were Israelis.
Hezbolllah is more than capable of hitting Israeli targets. They've been pounding Haifa and even almost assassinated Netanyahu as well. There are nearly daily announcements of casualties they've inflicted on Israeli troops. And yeah, Hamas is attacking Israelis. Look at what Israelis do to Palestinians daily.
My opinion can be of both. A lot of the world thinks this way. It essential boils down to saying to Israel "Yes it was tragic, but what did you expect was going to happen?".
Nowhere in the article does it mention holding civilians by force. They just say Hamas said not to leave. The article even mentioned that they have nowhere to go even if they did want to. And guess who's fault is that? Hint, it's not Hamas.
And yes, Hamas is going to be among civilians. They are Palestinians, and they are in one of the most densely populated areas by the force of Israel in what people have called the "largest open air prison."
Because you're using it to justify genocide. The article didn't say evacuated. It said vacant. Also, see my comment on civilians in the paragraph above.
How about they not intentionally attack civilians? Civilians stay they die, they flee they die, they go pray they die, they go to school they die, they go to a hospital they die, they report on things they die, people do humanitarian work they die. Why is it too much to ask that Israel stop intentionally targeting civilians? They just carpet bomb entire areas in buildings on a whim. This is not something we accept from any nation. Why on earth are we accepting it here? And don't get me that bullshit excuse that they have to because of Hamas. They've made it abundantly clear that they don't care about civilian deaths. Israel's evil is not a reflection on Hamas.
I explained what was debunked and what wasn't. Stop bringing this shit up.
Honest question, we've been going back and forth here, and I still don't get your point here, and I'm getting tired of your constant back and forth over minute points. Is your point that Hamas is bad? Sure, no one said they were good. Is it that Israel is justified in its actions? Absolutely not, and anyone who says otherwise is a disgusting immoral individual. That Israel's won't be safe if they make concessions and allow Palestinians to live freely? Well, that's kind of Israel's fault, so tough shit. I'm honestly not feeling talking with you anymore given how much bullshit of yours I had to debunk. And you clearly feel that brown lives matter less than white lives, so goodbye, and I hope you change your outlook. Because it's a oretty evil one.
Tell me, what percentage of Israel is Jews? And do you really think the antisemitic attitude has completely dissolved among Hamas?
The surrounding nations have failed numerous times to extinguish Israel, going four-to-one against them and still losing. Not to mention their continued assaults on the country since. If they could wipe out Israel, they would have.
People don't say "you don't get a right to complain about X" unless they think the victim deserved it. Rape apologists are well known for this.
We now have two sources corroborating the same phenomenon: the authorities not wanting Gazans to evacuate. The "American government propaganda" article has actual evidence backing it.
Does that justify using civilian garb, vehicles, and infrastructure to avoid getting attacked? Or alternately, using the whole Gaza Strip as a human shield while killing Israelis?
The building was vacant because it was evacuated. You've been truthful in other areas, why not here? The article states this, and no, them not being rockets doesn't mean they also weren't withdrawn:
Anyway...
The only other people I've seen who go "this atrocity wasn't actually as bad as people say it is" are people who support it in some way. It's a slope towards justifying the whole thing. See Holocaust and Holodomor deniers. You'll forgive me for seeing a similar pattern here.
My point is simple: Israel has a right to defend itself. When they're provoked, they can retaliate. Killing more women and children intentionally is horrible, obviously. But if nothing is done, then the attacks will continue, increasing in severity. If you didn't want to argue over "minute points," you shouldn't have sent me 31 links and told me to read all of them. If you don't want to talk anymore, that's fine. Just as I've come away learning more about Israel's crimes, I hope you come away from this better understanding Hamas's actions. "They don't get to complain about it" isn't the stance someone takes on 1,200 people getting raped and killed without thinking it was justified.
Ok buddy go continue supporting and justifying a genocide. I'm done explaining myself to you and I'm sick and tired of you putting words in my mouth. You're not interested in discussing or arguing in good faith. You just want a genocidal ethno-colony be justified in its genocidal actions.
Alright. I learned a lot and enjoyed talking with you, and I hope you have a good rest of the week.