this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8254 readers
51 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

On Ukraines side, but those nail bombs violate the Geneva Convention

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I didn’t know that. What is the difference between this, and “built-in” shrapnel in explosives (from a legal perspective)? The end result is all the same after the explosion

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Only think I know is that fragment size can't be too small, maybe you can argue that a nail is untested and thus can make micro fragments? Curious to know why this wouldn't be allowed

Edit: looks like there is a general ban on "unnecessary suffering or superfluous wounds", so if the nails are strong enough to injure but not kill, they are prohibited.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Let’s do some thorough testing then. For uh.. science

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Increased lethality to the target is OK though

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, this topic is pretty crazy. I get banning nukes, and gassing, but shrapnal limitations?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Right so my understanding is something like fishhooks would be illegal because they’re shaped to maximize suffering, but these would be fine.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)