this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Pixel Dungeon

1416 readers
4 users here now

This community is a place to talk strategies, tell stories, or discuss anything related to Pixel Dungeon or its many versions.

Rules:

We have a few title tags for standout posts:

Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Shattered Pixel Dungeon- v2.5.2, desktop linux version from github

I am playing v2.5.2 on desktop instead of v2.5.3. This is mainly because I do not like the removal of the stone of disarming (and also because I do not like bombs, which seem too high-tech for medieval fantasy IMO). So it is possible that this issue was fixed on the desktop version of 2.5.3, if it is an issue. However, since I am on v2.5.2, I have not checked whether or not the behavior is the same on v2.5.3.

The journal cuts off floor 1 at the bottom of the screen. See the attached picture. Is this intended or unintended?

Thank you for your help.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your violent made me curious, learned bombs are 11th century.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

1st: that's still medieval times 2nd: I said GUNPOWDER, not bombs. Bombs are made of gunpowder. Therefore, medieval bombs are possible. 3rd: Bombs are in other versions, so, I still don't know what that has to do with not updating. 4th: my violent? What does that even mean?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Chill dude.

Violent: autocorrect from comment.

  1. My point.
  2. Get a life and stop being a jerk.
  3. Gunpowder is from the 9th century
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

What point are you talking abt? When was I a jerk? As I alr said, 9th century are medieval times. Just because I disagreed with you (while you were actually wrong) doesn't mean that I'm a jerk lmao. I didn't call you dumb. Nor did I ever question your education. Why are you questioning me? Btw, that's an ad hominem fallacy, which disproves your point entirely.