World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Why are they even there?
From a real news source: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-peacekeepers-lebanon-say-we-are-staying-despite-israeli-attacks-2024-10-10/
They're supposed to be Peacekeepers not Peace Makers. There's a war happening and usually Peacekeepers leave the area when it becomes an active war.
Their mission was to find Hezbollah weapons... well it seems they weren't all that effective at doing that mission. Anyway, the IDF will remove those weapons for them. So they no longer have a mission to be there to do.
This is extremely incompetent on the part of the UN. It's a struggle for the UN to get countries to volunteer soldiers to be UN Peacekeepers. The UN using Peacekeepers as human shields isn't going to help in that. Peacekeepers serve an important function, and the UN putting them in unnecessary danger because it's upset at Israel is completely irresponsible.
You’re being downvoted on every post you do about this topic, you’ve been here for a year and you know that pretty much nobody agrees with you. I’m really wondering what’s your agenda.
Thanks for noticing!
Also the things I'm saying is consistent with what a majority of people outside of this little echo chamber think. This group you're in is going descending in a downward spiral of hatred. People in the same hatred spiral you're in have already committed violent acts, and more have attempted violence. This hatred of Israel will not lead to anything positive. Nothing good for the Palestinian people will come from this hatred.
I see photos of Gaza and I see a lot of similarity with the photos of German cities at the end of WWII. Germans were so indoctrinated in the politics of hatred (the same politics people here are engaging in) that the refused to accept defeat even when it was obvious to anyone. So they fought to the bitter end for the politics they were too indoctrinated in to accept reality and it destroyed their country.
Unlike the German people, I fear that because of outside pressure Palestinians may not be able to escape the politics of hatred even after they've experienced the destruction it lead to. Too much outside pressure on Palestinians (primarily from Iran, but you can see it even in the rhetoric here) to continue dying for the interests of others rather than negotiating with Israel to get as much as they can for themselves.
The real tragedy of this is that even if there was a ceasefire agreement tomorrow, a conflict similar to this will probably happen again for the next generation. It won't be because of people like me that call for Hamas to surrender. It'll be because of the people like you that "disagree with me" who push for Arabs to continue dying to serve the interests of Iranians.
Someone has to tell the truth around here, no matter how unpopular it may be.
Yeah not gonna read that
Yeah reading is hard. But if you put in some effort, I'm sure you can get better at it.
Why the fuck is the IDF there?
Because the UN obviously failed to disarm Hezbollah. Hezbollah were planning to use the weapons the UN failed to take from to attack Israel in a similar way (but on a larger scale) to October 7.
The Peacekeepers failed to keep the peace. Hezbollah has been firing rockets (which according to the UN, they shouldn't have) at Israel for a year. Many times at civilian population centers.
There is no reason for Peacekeepers to stay in a war zone.
That's good for you to admit that Hamas, Hezbollahand the Houthis are attacking Israel. Making progress!
So your main issue is that you want war to be fair, like it's a sport? It's not a sport, people die in wars. Making it fair just means it drags out longer causing more loss of life.
That graph also indicated that Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis are outmatched and should give up on trying to defeat Israel on a battle field. They should put down their weapons and sit down at a negotiating table. They aren't going to get everything they want (that's the nature of negotiation) but they'd get something and people don't have to needlessly die in their futile wars. And the longer they fight the less they'll get in any kind of peace.
You've just proven the stupidity of Iran's "Axis of Resistance". But these are fascist strongman "blood and soil" type movements and those type of movements are known for their stupidity resulting in their destruction.
Yes, people under the violence of Occupation, Settler Colonialism, and Apartheid are bound to fight back by any means possible, regardless of the difference in military capability. Israel has been the one that has prevented peace for generations. Made all the more obvious when they assassinate the principal negotiator of peace talks.
Settlements, Occupation, and Apartheid
Israel justifies the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.
This type of settlement, where the native population gets 'Transferred' to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice.
The mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948:
Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967:
While the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements
The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.
Visualizing the Ethnic Cleansing
Peace Process and Solution
Both Hamas and Fatah have agreed to a Two-State solution based on the 1967 borders for decades. Oslo and Camp David were used by Israel to continue settlements in the West Bank and maintain an Apartheid, while preventing any actual Two-State solution
How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution
‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe
One State Solution, Foreign Affairs
Hamas proposed a full prisoner swap as early as Oct 8th, and agreed to the US proposed UN Permanent Ceasefire Resolution. Additionally, Hamas has already agreed to no longer govern the Gaza Strip, as long as Palestinians receive liberation and a unified government can take place.
If you engage in genocidal acts like what occurred on October 7, whatever justification for it is moot. The world cannot allow for genocide to be a successful tactic.
Stop trying to rationalize genocide, ok? It's an evil way to think about things. Hamas cannot be allowed to achieve any kind of success after what they did. Otherwise others will try the same. In fact Hezbollah was planning something similar to October 7 just from the propaganda successes Hamas achieved. Is that what you wanted?
They are there because the Israelis act like spolied violent children. They dont WANT to be there.
Yeah they're soldiers, they follow orders. The UN leadership is abdicating it's responsibility to ensure the safety of the soldiers that countries have generously provided them. So they're having Peacekeepers that no longer have a missions stay in an obvious warzone because why? The leadership at the UN is acting like children here. They're putting lives at risk for their own petty reasons.
Israel targeting Civilians and UN personnel/facilities with the justification of 'human shields' is nothing new.
Please link to the sources. The link is more important then the graphics
AJ Israel-Lebanon Live Tracker
Euro-Med Monitor Report
Is Al Jazeera still putting up casualty numbers like it's scoreboard in a sport? Seems disgusting to me how they do that.
So my question is, do you think Hamas keeping Israelis hostage (which is a war crime BTW) is worth having all of this death?
Hamas tried immediately to trade the Israeli hostages for hostages the Israelis are holding, without charge, withour trail, indefinitely. israel said no. But no one ever wants to talk about the hostages the Israelis took before Oct 7. They want to pretend this started on Oct 7.
Yeah they traded for Yahya Sinwar in a previous deal. You know, the guy that planned October 7 and is now the leader of Hamas.
Sure, it didn't begin on October 7. And it also didn't begin with the next time Israel does an air strike. Or the next time. Or the time after that.
Palestinians are dying and you're rooting for a continuation of violence indefinitely. You obviously don't care about Palestinian lives because you don't want the conflict to end even while Hamas and Hezbollah are losing badly and are only getting anyone that happens to be near them killed.
and you're making things up out of thin air and being utterly wrong about your fantasy conclusions. Its like arguing with a republican.
You're no longer considering any facts that challenge the narratives you get directly from social media and dubious "news" sources. You probably hate Democrats, probably look the other way about any antisemitic remarks from your peers. Also look the other way about atrocities committed by the fascists that are "on your side".
The pro-Palestinian movement (really the anti-Israeli movement, if we're being honest) is an alt-right movement if we're being objective about comparing it to other political movements. Really how is this movement any different from any of the other alt-right movements? Only because you don't call yourself alt-right?
Spacecowboy@ You said:
You do realize netenyahu aligns himself with far right leaders and Israel has a far right government. Dont you? And that Palestine protestors are almost uniformly progressives, on the far other end of the political extreme from the far right? https://www.timesofisrael.com/yair-netanyahu-exposes-israels-own-version-of-the-alt-right/
https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/02/24/why-benjamin-netanyahu-loves-the-european-far-right-orban-kaczynski-pis-fidesz-visegrad-likud-antisemitism-hungary-poland-illiberalism/
https://www.npr.org/2024/03/26/1241022402/a-look-into-the-rise-of-right-wing-israel
It seems that you dont understand what the term alt-right even means. Its a far right white nationalist movement.
And you make up a lot of "probablies" out of thin air, which sure looks like mental illness to me.
Blaming others for exactly what you are guilty of is a classic republican move. Again with this from you. It gets old.
Or do you really honestly think palestinians and their supporters are part of a white nationalist movement? How does that make any sense at all? The "white" people here are Israelis. Palestinians and Arabs dont consider themselves to be white. But part of the alt right you say, interesting. Are these nonwhite members of the alt-right.. hating themselves? And by your reckoning, the far right Israels are the victims of the alt right? ?? really? So its alt-right human rights supporters vs the far right Israelis? Is this some kind of rightwing civil war? You'd think they could get along being so closely ideologically aligned.
Your assertions are all just so remarkably crazy that I dont even know what to say. But I think its past time for me to block your username.
You realize that Hamas is a fascist organization. Don't you?
Fascism isn't actually about specific ethnicities. It isn't even about being specifically antisemitic, though Hamas most definitely has that going on.
Fascism is about promoting strongman to protect people from the other, the other usually being of a different ethnicity and/or religious group. The other is paradoxically both strong and weak. It's about promoting a return to a past ethnic makeup of a region to how it was in the history book, ie. blood and soil. It's about using past humiliations to entice people into accepting the strongman as their leader. It's about de-legitimizing democracy and the free press. It's about using violence to achieve these goals, including the use of ethnic cleansing and genocide. It's about maintaining a violent fervour and a hatred towards the enemy so people don't question the strongman's leadership.
Hamas fits this description. If you're in the same movement as Hamas, you're at best alt-right, or at worst a fascist. I know among your fringe group you don't talk about yourselves that way and will put on blinders to avoid seeing Hamas for what it is. But people outside of your little group actually do see Hamas for what it is and see you for who you are.
If you could stop subjecting yourself to imagery meant to keep you in a violent fervour for even a few days you might begin to question the leadership of the strongman Yahya Sinwar which has resulted in the destruction of Gaza. But you probably won't do that because you're stuck in an endless emotional manipulation loop. And that's exactly how fascism works.
If you find thousands dead to be casual, that's on you. The IDF sure does if they're Palestinian or Lebanese.
Hamas was willing to do a full hostage exchange since Oct 8th. Israel has rejected any permanent ceasefire, that would release all the hostages, in favor of genocide. So maybe ask the Israeli Government that question instead.
I'm not pushing Al Jazeera's pretty graphical scoreboards here. I'm not the one presenting death in a casual manner.
No, the onus is not on Israel for this. Hamas massacred villages (genocide) and took civilians hostage, which is a war crime. They continue to hold hostages, so they're continuing in their war crimes every day.
It's obvious they're only holding the hostages now to prolong this so that Al Jazeera can make pretty graphics on the suffering of Palestinians so they can get more donation money. It seems you're content to be a part of this sick grift Hamas has made by monetizing the suffering of Palestinians.
It's obvious now they aren't going to win anything other than the propganda war. But Israel obviously doesn't give a shit about the propaganda, and they're winning on every other front. So why continue the propaganda? Do you want this to drag on longer so more people will die?
Hamas did commit war crimes on Oct 7, not genocide. Nor does this kind of violence come out of nowhere. When people are subjected to the daily violence of Apartheid for generations, they will inevitably use violence to fight back. The underlying cause of all this violence stems from Zionism (Ethnic Cleansing, Settler Colonialism, Apartheid), and the only way to end the violence to to end the underlying cause.
Apartheid
Amnesty Report
Human Rights Watch Report
B'TSelem Report with quick Explainer
Genocide
Holocaust scholar to discuss his conclusion that Gaza campaign constitutes genocide
UN Expert Says Impunity for Israel Must End as 'Genocidal Violence' Spreads to West Bank
“A Textbook Case of Genocide”: Israeli Holocaust Scholar Raz Segal Decries Israel’s Assault on Gaza
800+ Legal Scholars Say Israel May Be Perpetrating 'Crime of Genocide' in Gaza
Law for Palestine Releases Database with 500+ Instances of Israeli Incitement to Genocide – Continuously Updated
AP News, Time, Reuters, Vox, CBC
Neverending Violence
Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli Prisons
Palestinians are jailed without charge, forced into false confessions, routinely tortured, raped, denied medical attention, and some killed as a result. This includes hundreds of children.
Palestinians denied civil rights (HRW) including Military Court (B'TSelem)
Palestinian Prisoners in Israel (wiki)
Children are jailed and abused in Israeli prisons (Save The Children)
Torture and Abuse in Interrogations (B'TSelem)
Thousands of Palestinians are held without charge under Israeli detention policy (NPR)
Urgently investigate inhumane treatment and enforced disappearance of Palestinians detainees from Gaza (Amnesty)
Israel/OPT: Horrifying cases of torture and degrading treatment of Palestinian detainees amid spike in arbitrary arrests (Amnesty)
In the Shadow of the Holocaust by Masha Gessen, the situation in Gaza is compared to the Warsaw Ghettos. The comparison was also made by a Palestinian poet who was later killed by an Israeli airstrike. Adi Callai, an Israeli, has also written on the parallels in his article The Gaza Ghetto Uprising and expanded upon in his corresponding video
Massacring villages is genocide. This wasn't civilians getting hit by stray bullets or shrapnel, not a targeting error, not some rogue member of Hamas getting out of control. This was Hamas combatants masscring villages under the orders of Yahya Sinwar, who is now the leader of Hamas.
You're desperately trying to make excuses for the genocide committed by Hamas because you've dehumanized Israelis. You're a genocide denier.
I'm the one advocating for an end to violence and equal rights for both Israeli and Palestinians.
You are projecting hard
One or Two State Solution
How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution
‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe
One State Solution, Foreign Affairs
Hamas has already agreed to no longer govern the Gaza Strip, as long as Palestinians receive liberation and a unified government can take place.
Both Hamas and Fatah have agreed to a Two-State solution based on the 1967 borders for decades. Oslo and Camp David were used by Israel to continue settlements in the West Bank and maintain an Apartheid, while preventing any actual Two-State solution
Dude, just block him. Can't you see how he distorts reality? Either he's a troll or completely indoctrinated. You will not convince this kind of trash. Ignore him.
Yeah, you're right. He's not worth arguing with. I think I'll still post the sources to show he's wrong in case anyone sees his misinformation. I'd rather it not go uncontested. But yeah, no point arguing with him. Any onlookers unsure can check the sources and see for themselves that he's wrong
Copy-paste as many words as you want, but as long as you refuse to accept Hamas committed genocide, you'll always be a genocide denier.