this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
90 points (98.9% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
90
EVs Take A Record 97.5% Share In Norway — Tesla Takes Third Of Market (cleantechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Watched the video, pretty fun. It really shows that the Cybertruck was designed around Musk's current paranoid obsessive personality.

It is critically flawed in almost every way except two: 1) it's fast as hell. And 2) IT TOOK A C4 CHARGE WITH A MINOR DENT! LOL

Nevertheless, in terms of use-case analysis, it's a sloppily designed truck. And while I have to admit the C4 thing was impressive, if we are thinking about it as some sort of quasi-military vehicle, then, while the C4 thing might be valuable, all of the other critical failures make it worthless and dangerous for that application.

Basically it didn't try to be a good truck because they tried to make it withstand gunfire and C4. And it's not good as a quasi-military vehicle because they tried to make it also a regular truck.