this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6847 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (92 children)

Is anyone brave enough to ask why?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Women's lib has been great for women but not so good for men. So men are becoming reactionary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What the fuck?

Just because one side gets more rights, doesn't mean the other side loses rights.

I guess if the rights you miss is the ability to beat your wife without repercussions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bullshit. Most men suffer under toxic patriarchy as well. I absolutely love that this shit is finally getting pulled into the spotlight. I have not suffered a single iota of harm from anything "woke" and I would argue that no honest man has either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How do men suffer under patriarchy? Do u really want to be the one blaming 75% of suicides on men not being allowed to beat their wives? Sounds like ur calling all cis men evil bad people. I wonder what such a narrative would do to a young man trying to develop a sence of self, identity, and personal ideology?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

How do men suffer under patriarchy?

Queer and gender nonconforming men get an immense amount of abuse due to patriarchy. Even gender conforming straight boys and men do if they show sensitivity in any real capacity. The abuse of boys and young men for the sake of making them “man up” is hardly an unusual in many areas.

Do u really want to be the one blaming 75% of suicides on men not being allowed to beat their wives?

What? This has nothing to do with the comment you replied to.

Sounds like ur calling all cis men evil bad people.

No, this is a ridiculous conclusion you drew from someone saying patriarchy hurts everyone.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do u really want to be the one blaming 75% of suicides on men not being allowed to beat their wives?

This is so back asswards it is genuinely astounding.

Men are 75% of suicides under patriarchy.

Damn I wonder how someone could conclude that patriarchy hurts the majority of men.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Men are 75% of suicides under patriarchy.

Male suicide is getting worse every year the patriarchy is getting destroyed more every year, im simply pointing out the correlation is backward sof what u claim.

Damn I wonder how someone could conclude that patriarchy hurts the majority of men.

The data correlates exactly the wrong way for this to be true.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correlation does not equal causation.

I would point to the economic disparity that is widening in virtually every advanced economy as a much more relevant driver of male suicide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correlation does not equal causation.

Exactly but causation does not come without correlation. Causation is a subset of correlation.

I would point to the economic disparity that is widening in virtually every advanced economy as a much more relevant driver of male suicide.

Economic disparity should be effecting the genders equally unless you are saying women are doing better financially.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe do some research about statistical concepts before spouting what sounds good to you. Causation can absolutely 'come' without correlation.

You are a great example of someone not understanding that things are complex so you reach for tabloid explanations because they are comfortable and simple.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe do some research about statistical concepts before spouting what sounds good to you. Causation can absolutely 'come' without correlation.

Name a counter example

You are a great example of someone not understanding that things are complex so you reach for tabloid explanations because they are comfortable and simple.

I refuse to engage in bad faith argument and school yard insults.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Name a counter example

Statistics isn't defined by examples. Educate yourself, this is a very well known and understood concept. Staying in ignorance is your choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Instead of baseless bad faith arguments you could have provided a single counter example. You chose to insult me and call me ignorant instead of proving me wrong. Prove me wrong prove your intellectual superiority yoy claim to have.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't need to prove you wrong with examples, you are wrong, it's very well documented and widely understood. If you choose to not believe it and can't be bothered to research it yourself then you have chosen to stay ignorant, and wrong, which is your right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Its ok to admit that your wrong im not gonna judge you. I just want you to think about it for a second if something is causational we can say a causes b. If this is the case then most cases of a will result in b, thus a correlates with b.

We can apply a proof by contradiction say we have a causes b but a does not correlate with b. Then in this case we are saying if there is a it causes b it is thus a contradiction to say that a and b do not correlate as that would require that we have a without b but if a causes b this is impossible.

I gave you ample oppertunity to do some research and realise that you have a surface level understanding or logic, mathematics, and statistics without me needing to prove your complete lack of understanding.

Please educate yourself before you speak and if u must speak without doing so be willing when proven wrong to admit it without insulting people like a child having a tantrum.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Dishonest men still get to vote though

load more comments (89 replies)