this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

> Greentext

7533 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah. So you're misunderstanding what I mean by it being biological in nature. It being biological doesn't mean that there are only two or anything like that. Gender, physical sex, and sexuality, (and probably damn near everything that goes in to who a person is) is on a multiaxal spectrum and people inhabit different areas of this. Those different areas appear to be determined by processes during fetal development. You can be born without sexuality but it is also biological in nature. Does this clarify the confusion here?

This is the spectrum of gender I most ascribe to (though I see it as 3d), but I am also open to there being more to it:

And despite the dot (not my dot) I assume most people inhabit a small or even large area of the chart. Mine would be somewhere between andro and femme, about half way up the bar, and probably have an area of like 8 squares to account for my own limited fluidity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This chart concerns me. Are you saying that "being masculine" and "being feminine" are biological? Not just gender? Can you define "being masculine" and "being feminine" without being gender-essentialist?

I'm veering off a bit, because we weren't talking about masculinity or femininity at all a moment ago, but these are 100% socially created things and to argue about them from a biological perspective requires being a gender-essentialist.

If not, I would err away from "masculine" and "feminine" as descriptors of gender itself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ugh. Seriously? It's just a chart attempting to simplify people's gender identity and I even said I see it as more 3D and complex than it is. I'm not going to discuss the merits of the chart. I deleted the whole part about the stupid chart because it doesn't matter and I don't care to defend it.

This conversation is over. You pivoted because you know your baseless accusations have been disproven. In the future, try not to be such an annoying asshole when you simply don't understand someone else's viewpoint. Goodbye.