this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
837 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59405 readers
2546 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Four more large Internet service providers told the US Supreme Court this week that ISPs shouldn't be forced to aggressively police copyright infringement on broadband networks.

While the ISPs worry about financial liability from lawsuits filed by major record labels and other copyright holders, they also argue that mass terminations of Internet users accused of piracy "would harm innocent people by depriving households, schools, hospitals, and businesses of Internet access." The legal question presented by the case "is exceptionally important to the future of the Internet," they wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why don't they start with OpenAI and other LLM vendors, because they are the biggest copyright infringement abusers of all time?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because they're also rich. Laws are for the poors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

In Canada they absolutely are lol

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Which is why the Supreme Court is hearing the case. Two wealthy industries fighting out who gets to extract the most wealth.

load more comments (2 replies)