Science Memes

11047 readers

3440 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1577

Launches (mander.xyz)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

142 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 99 points 2 months ago (16 children)

It's definitely harder to decay the orbit into the sun directly than it is to get to escape velocity. But to play devil's advocate, there is probably a way to get them into the sun while being a similar cost to escape velocity. All you need to do is burn prograde to a super high aphelion, ride all the way out there to Pluto or whatever and then do a small retrograde burn to bring your perihelion inside the sun's photosphere. When you then get back towards the sun years later you would slam into it with a sick velocity that I think would be worth the decades-long wait.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Haven’t you basically done everything needed to escape the solar system by the time you do the burn to turn back again?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you would only need to burn a little bit more on your initial burn, that's why I said the cost would be similar.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Fair. Your way is certainly more epic.

load more comments (13 replies)