Futurology

I responded to what you wrote, not what’s in the article.

The children are healthy so far and his admirable intentions don't mitigate the fact that he's experimenting on humans. Even if he is successful (and I hope for the sake of the children he was), it's still unethical to try.

I highlighted the important parts, the ones I’m disputing. I’m not defending him or his methods, I’m calling you out on your (maybe unintentionally) generalized conclusion.