this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2024
748 points (94.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

5778 readers
1990 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 126 points 2 months ago (19 children)

Reading that thread is painful. He complains about a feature that is in testing because he didn't know he could enable it and then complains because it doesn't work like how he wants it to even though he just had to expand the sidebar.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (11 children)

But it is pretty obvious that it is not the point here, or isn't it? The fact that Mozilla is putting work into AI instead of I don't know rewriting more of the Firefox backend in rust, which was the initial purpose of the language, is offensive. The Mozilla/Firefox VPN is offensive, because it is shit (was shit when I tried it). Sneaking in advertisement IDs into Firefox which are enabled by default is offensive. Having a for profit branch of Mozilla is offensive.

These are all from memory, and probably not accurate, the point still stands, Mozilla puts stupid shit into Firefox nobody wants or needs, instead of developing it along user needs.

Firefox is the last bastion of independent browser development. miss me with $obscure_browser_project, because they have no market share, cannot be used by my granny and are often using components of different browsers.

This is all we got, the rest is chromium based and is developed by a advertisement company.

I just want them to not add stupid shit. It costs money, manpower, and my nerves. None of them are available in abundance.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mozilla VPN is rebranded mullvad, it should have been pretty good.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mullvad doesn't support port forwarding so it's useless for most people that actually have a need for a VPN and aren't just victims of influencer marketing making them believe they need a VPN

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So, genuine question, what do you do using your VPN where you need port forwarding? I keep seeing people say that port forwarding is a requirement in their VPN but nobody says what they actually use it for.

To my knowledge you should only need that if you're hosting something through your VPN but I don't even know how that would work or why you would want to do that. If you're doing that then why not just rent a remote server and not need the VPN? I can't think of anything off the top of my head that would need to be hosted from home, accessible remotely, and be completely hidden behind a VPN.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You need port forwarding for peer-to-peer protocols like Bittorrent

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've never done any manual port forwarding for torrenting and everything seems to download and seed correctly. Does the client automatically do it? Is it only required for private trackers? Once again a genuine question because I only know just enough about all of this to avoid the letters from my ISP.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Torrenting only works if the peers can connect to each other. If you dont have a port forwarded, then you can only connect to other peers that have a forwarded port. At least one of the 2 parties connecting to each other needs an open port for the connection to happen.

If you are on a public tracker it can happen that a torrent is shown to have multiple seeders, but if you try downloading it without having an open port it won't work unless at least one of those seeders has their port open. This is mostly a problem on public trackers, since many private trackers enforce their members to have working port forwarding.

So it is technically possible to download torrents without working port forwarding, but only if enough other other peers have port forwarding set up on their end and your tracker doesn't (rightly) ban you for it.

Does the client automatically do it?

If you aren't using a VPN then most torrent clients will automatically set up port forwarding on your router using Upnp. Unless Upnp is disabled in your routers settings. If you are using a VPN you usually need to set up port forwarding manually, but there are some vpn clients that do it automatically

Edit: this article explains it better than me: https://protonvpn.com/blog/port-forwarding/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Oh my god this explains so much! I always wondered why sites would show torrents having +200 seeders and I would be lucky to get maybe 10 when downloading. I'll have to get my port forwarding set up. Thank you so much!

Now I just need to switch VPN providers but I've been planning on doing that for a while anyways.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)