this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1280 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

10842 readers
2289 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 month ago (22 children)

AIs are wonderful. They provoke wonder.

AIs are marvellous. They cause marvels.

AIs are fantastic. They create fantasies.

AIs are glamorous. They project glamour.

AIs are enchanting. They weave enchantment.

AIs are terrific. They beget terror.

The thing about words is that meanings can twist just like a snake, and if you want to find snakes look for them behind words that have changed their meaning.

No one ever said AIs are nice.

AIs are bad.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

AI at this stage is just a tool. This might change one day, but today is not that day. Blame the user, not the tool.

AI and ML was being used to assist in scientific research long before ChatGPT or StableDiffusion hit the mainstream news cycle. AIs can be used to predict all sorts of outcomes, including ones relevant to climate, weather, even medical treatment. The University I work for even have a funded PhD program looking at using AI algorithms to detect cancer better, I found out because one of my friends is applying for it.

The research I am doing with AI is not quite as important as that, but it could shape the future of both cyber security and education, as I am looking at using for teaching cyber security students about ethical hacking and security. Do people also use LLMs to hack businesses or government organisations and cause mayhem? Quite probably, and they definitely will in the future. That doesn't mean that the tool itself is bad, just that some people will inevitably abuse it.

Not all of this stuff is run by private businesses either. A lot of work is done by open source devs working on improving publicly available AI and ML models in their spare time. Likewise some of this stuff is publicly funded through universities like mine. There are people way better than me out there using AIs for all sorts of good things including stopping hackers, curing patients, teaching the next generation, or monitoring climate change. Some of them have been doing it for years.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I was just making a clever reference

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The problem is that some people like me won't get that reference and instead think AIs are universally bad. A lot of people already think this way, and it's hard to know who believes what.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Clearly, based on your responses, you don't think AI/LLMs are universally bad. And anyone who is that easily swayed by what is essentially a clever shitpost likely also thinks the earth is flat and birds aren't real.

You know. Morons.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that people selling LLMs keep calling them AI, and people keep buying their bullshit.

AI isn't necessarily bad. LLMs are.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

LLMs have legitimate uses today even if they are currently somewhat limited. In the future they will have more legitimate and illegitimate uses. The capabilities of current LLMs are often oversold though, which leads to a lot of this resentment.

Edit: also LLMs very much are AI (specifically ANI) and ML. It's literally a form of deep learning. It's not AGI, but nobody with half a brain ever claimed it was.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

LLMs have legitimate uses today

No they don't. The only thing they can be somewhat reliable for is autocomplete, and the slight improvement in quality doesn't compensate the massive increase in costs.

In the future they will have more legitimate and illegitimate uses

No. Thanks to LLM peddlers being excessively greedy and saturating the internet with LLM generated garbage newly trained models will be poisoned and only get worse with every iteration.

The capabilities of current LLMs are often oversold

LLMs have only one capability: to produce the most statistically likely token after a given chain of tokens, according to their model.

Future LLMs will still only have this capability, but since their models will have been trained on LLM generated garbage their results will quickly diverge from anything even remotely intelligible.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is false. Anyone who has used these tools for long enough can tell you this is false.

LLMs have been used to write computer code, craft malware, and even semi-independently hack systems with the support of other pieces of software. They can even grade student's work and give feedback, but it's unclear how accurate this will be. As someone who actually researches the use of both LLMs and other forms of AI you are severely underestimating their current capabilities, never mind what they can do in the future.

I also don't know where you came to the conclusion that hardware performance is always an issue, given that LLM model size varies immensely as does the performance requirements. There are LLMs that can run and run well on an average laptop or even smartphone. It honestly makes me think you have never heard of LLaMa models inc. TinyLLaMa or similar projects.

Future LLMs will still only have this capability, but since their models will have been trained on LLM generated garbage their results will quickly diverge from anything even remotely intelligible.

You can filter data you get from the internet to websites archived before LLMs were even invented as a concept. This is trivial to do for some data sets as well. Some data sets used for this training have already been created without LLM output (think about how the first LLM was trained).

Sources:

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)