this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1757 readers
12 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Remember that anything "created" by an AI cannot be copyrighted, so the fact that there's a label representing them is concerning... and possibly actionable

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if they ran a local model to make the music?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would what computer the model runs on make even a sliver of difference?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I was implying the training data would be local or user created. Not just using music from the internet.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not Actionable… you can sell things that don’t have copyright it just means anyone can sell it, you could theoretically rip the song straight from the internet and resell it on the same platform right next to them (unless any human creativity is involved then that has copyright )

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

(unless any human creativity is involved then that has copyright )

This is the part people usually forget when they spout "it can't be copyrighted." If a human edits the output in some capacity then that is still copyrighted. It's not really the gotcha a lot of people seem to think it is.