this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Texas

1475 readers
1 users here now

A community for news, current events, and overall topics regarding the state of Texas

Other Texas Lemmy Communties to follow

Sports

BYPASSING PAYWALLS

Rules (Subject to Change)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1
Texas inmate is exonerated after spending nearly 34 years in prison for wrongful conviction (apnews.com)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/27939300

A Texas man who spent 34 years in prison after being wrongfully convicted of aggravated assault was exonerated Thursday by a Dallas County judge who ruled that he is actually innocent.

The judge approved a motion by the Dallas County District Attorney’s office to dismiss the case against Benjamin Spencer, 59, who was initially convicted in 1987 of murder in the carjacking and death of Jeffrey Young.

“This day has been a long time coming. I am relieved and humbled to help correct this injustice,” said Dallas County Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot.

Spencer, who has maintained his innocence, saw his 1987 conviction later overturned. He was then tried again and convicted and sentenced to life in prison for aggravated robbery of Young.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Notice, Texas got it wrong TWICE. He was convicted of murder and expnerated, then tried and convicted for aggravated assault, in the same case.

There was exonerating evidence the prosecution didn't provide to the defense, which by itself should told the case, that's literally why the Rust trial against Baldwin was tossed out

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

what in the effed up double jeopardy is this

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Not double jeopardy because they're different charges, technically. He wasn't tried for murder twice.

The real question I have is if he was exonerated from the first murder conviction, how did they manage to convince a jury a second time with that information. The only way I can imagine is somehow preventing the evidence that exonerated him the first time, and the fact he was exonerated, from being used in court. Which to be honest sounds like something the Texas kangaroo courts would do. Texas does lead the way with wrongful convictions, there has to be a reason.