this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32310 readers
859 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (34 children)

They share a common enemy, democracy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (25 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

President for life doesn't sound democratic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Term limits that silence the will of the people don't sound democratic to me

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Neither does censoring criticism of the government and proxy depictions of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine for a split second that the strongest government in the world is constantly attempting to cause the overthrow of your legitimately popular government, despite it being popular and significantly beloved by almost all people there. This external, most powerful government in the world tried to cause unrest in every possible way, including funding all opposition groups and organizations regardless of their violent/genocidal intent (e.g. Falun Gong, Islamic terror groups) and cause unrest on your borders (Pakistan, Afghanistan, Korea).

What do you do? When good faith polling shows that you're popular and fulfilling the needs and desires of your country's working class but a foreign press tries to speak about the terribleness and need for overthrow, do you just let that happen with more money and propoganda than you can possibly provide to support yourself? Or do you censor the BS and report to your population that these images/ideas/orgs are actually subversive and attempting to change the government they legitimately love.

In this hypothetical situation, what do you propose? Allowing the propaganda but claiming it's wrong has failed in many projects, and resulted in massacres once fascism won (Chile, Indonesia). Just trying to set up a wall of no information works for a bit, but info can cross anyways (USSR). Allowing limited access if you search for it but not allowing it's widespread propagation is the method of china. A VPN allows you to see it all, but it can't be spread too widely before it is stopped from being viral.

Do you have a better solution? Because this is how China presents itself and how the Chinese population sees it

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)