this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7193 readers
927 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In 2021, when China banned bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, crypto miners flocked to the United States in search of cheap electricity and looser regulations. In a few short years, the U.S.’s share of global crypto mining operations grew from 3.5 percent to 38 percent, forming the world’s largest crypto mining industry.

The impacts of this shift have not gone unnoticed. From New York to Kentucky to Texas, crypto mining warehouses have vastly increased local electricity demand to power their 24/7 computing operations. Their power use has stressed local grids, raised electricity bills for nearby residents, and kept once-defunct fossil fuel plants running. Yet to date, no one knows exactly how much electricity the U.S. crypto mining industry uses.

That’s about to change as federal officials launch the first comprehensive effort to collect data on cryptocurrency mining’s energy use. This week, the U.S. Energy Information Administration, an energy statistics arm of the federal Department of Energy, is requiring 82 commercial crypto miners to report how much energy they’re consuming. It’s the first survey in a new program aiming to shed light on an opaque industry by leveraging the agency’s unique authority to mandate energy use disclosure from large companies.

“This is nonpartisan data that’s collected from the miners themselves that no one else has,” said Mandy DeRoche, deputy managing attorney in the clean energy program at the environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. “Understanding this data is the first step to understanding what we can do next.”

read more: https://truthout.org/articles/crypto-mining-may-use-more-electricity-than-the-entire-state-of-washington/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thats a generalization. Israel absolutely couldnot continue their genocide without the US sending them money and weapons. Sanctions in this case would absolutely stop that and bring an end to the genocide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, you made a general statement (countries committing genocide), so I made a general response.

In the case of Israel, maybe it would, but that's because Israel needs the US and Europe for trade because much of the rest of the world hates them. >50% exports go to US and EU, and just under half of imports come from US and EU.

But if we sanction Israel, they'll likely increase trade dramatically with China, which isn't in US interests, especially since we've given them so much military tech that China would be very interested in getting access to. Israel isn't just going to roll over, they'll take any action they can to continue their current agenda, just like Russia is doing despite crippling Western sanctions.

That's what the whole article I linked is about. Sanctions can work, but they often backfire as well. It's probably easier and more effective to make military equipment sales contingent on Israel reforming how they conduct their war.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago

China also opposes Israel's war crimes. And Israel couldn't support their population with trade alone. They're dependent on money from the US just to keep food and water flowing