this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Economics
1698 readers
1 users here now
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Then perhaps reforming the commons? Agricultural land & surplus are owned in common by the people who live in the area. Government pays for the production of those food stuffs and only gets a nominal % tax on the surplus.
The Soviets tried that and it is the root cause of some of the most serious famines ever seen. Not a good idea. Government, by its nature, is an inefficiency engine. You want the government in the picture as little as possible. This increases that and will cause more inequality not less.
What are you talking about? There was one famine, and it happened near the beginning of the Soviet Union’s history, after a civil war. And this was a country where for centuries under tsarist rule famines had been a common occurrence. What the Soviet Union did was end famines.
This sounds like neoliberal Road to Serfdom nonsense. Inefficient compared to what, the invisible hand?
Again, what are you talking about? Inequality in Russia has risen since the fall of the Soviet Union. Have you forgotten about shock therapy already?
Who said Gov is an inefficiency engine? That sounds more like neo-liberal dogma then actual peer reviewed work.