"quite difficult to do neutral" -> "unbiased information. Dear Lord." Is your reading comprehension alright? We are talking about TV high-jacking showing some historical soviet afghan war footage and pictures of gored russian soldiers. Declaring this as the ultimate "truth about war" is hyperbolic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Unbiased and neutral can easily be used interchangeably here, anyone with common sense could crack that code bud.

Jesus dude, you honestly need to talk to someone. You legit seem to have a narcissism problem.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You imply I think Wikipedia is per default unbiased and all truthful which it isn't and I stated clearly otherwise with "quite difficult to be neutral". So I am not sure where the misunderstanding comes from.

Bad rep for going down the personal route in a discussion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I believe you when you say you're not sure.

Bad rep for going down the personal route in a discussion.

You come at my reading comprehension then try to high road the convo. Dude, you're displaying every characteristic of someone who is chronically online. Take a breath and reflect lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I did that because the answer didn't make sense as it is an issue I just acknowledged.