this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
808 readers
1 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Not really (with maybe the exception of east germany, but not through any internal revolution, but dragged into a socialism by the USSR after WW2). Every country that became socialist was previously a feudal monarchy, and largely produced an agricultural surplus.
One of Lenin's major correction's to Marx and Engels, was that capitalism does not break in it's birthplaces, where capitalism is most entrenched, but in the weakest links in the chain, where capitalist industry and power is still in a precarious position.
This was the case in Russia, China, Cuba, DPRK, Vietnam, Laos, - etc.
Old comment about this:
Start MoP -> | End | Examples
|
|
Clan | Socialist | Mongolia Clan | Feudal | Germany Clan | Slave | West Africa Slave | Capitalist | US Feudal | Capitalist | Western Europe Feudal | Socialist | USSR, China, DPRK, Vietnam, Cuba Capitalist | Socialist | East Germany Socialist | Capitalist | USSR Feudal | Slave | Roman Republic Slave | Feudal | Late Roman Empire (Colonate)
Note:
Also to your point, if there is a list of countries most likely to have a revolution, IMO the US would be dead last on the list. Far more likely would be a few countries taking the socialist road in South America, and Africa. Also possibly Russia, which some comrades have commented on.
Well that's depressing. But makes sense.