GenZedong

4243 readers

15 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

US charges 4 Americans of African People's Socialist Party and Uhuru Movement and 3 Russians in discord about election case - totally a democracy (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Move on, black americans being charged with a crime for criticising their country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

The only "crime" the DOJ is alleging is that they violated the Forigen Agents Act by not discolosing funds they may have received from the FSB, or through FSB agents. Not too sure since they constantly claim the Russian nationals that funded ASP were FSB.

Not even clear that this would stand in court since these talking points have been said for decades now. If the DOJ is arguing the intent is due to an "unresonable" sum of money being accepted, in the same way an "unreasonable" amount of drugs must mean intent to distribute, then that would be totally discredited by the fact that these are not new rhetorical talking points.

Imo very weak case, I wouldn't hold my breath for a non guilty verdict, but this is not going to be easy for the DOJ to prosecute.