PC Gaming

8250 readers

545 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

101

Swen Vincke was worried that the 100-hour Baldur's Gate 3 would be too short, which is why Larian made a ton of extra areas they wound up cutting (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was my experience on the first play through. My second and third though by the time you get to the city the game pretty much falls apart. Doesn't help that it plays like ass during the entirety of act 3 too.

Act 2 and 3 should have been swapped. Would have flowed much better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The pacing when you get to act 3 is off. You've just made major progress in your personal quest, and discovered that there's a plot to take over the entire world, and you stop to help a kid find his mommy, and investigate a missing hooker? I had to ask for help on how to get into the city because I declined all of those quests because I felt like I had more important things to do. That said, the game is still a monumental achievement, and probably the best game I've ever played. You can't really fault it that it's still not as good the third time you play through it.