this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
9059 readers
6 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
F1 Calendar
2024 Calendar
| Location |
Date |
| πΊπΈ United States |
21-23 Nov |
| πΆπ¦ Qatar |
29 Nov-01 Dec |
| π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi |
06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Someone explains what this means to me, a dumbass.
The inside rear wheel is braked harder, which pulls the car into the curve, helping it rotate better while braking.
Short version that doesn't require technical knowledge is Red Bull Racing (RBR) were using a system on their brakes that wasn't allowed but it was suspected that teams were using anyway. The rules were publicly clarified before the Miami GP and then Max Verstappen experienced a break issue during the race causing him to DNF. It was speculated at the time that this mechanical failure was a result of them having to removing or change the design of their breaks. Max and Red Bull in general also started to lose pace compared to other teams after Miami as well. This is basically confirming those suspicions.
Are you saying that the rules did not strictly forbid this system prior to Miami and the underlined text was added to the regulations to eliminate the loophole RBR was using to help win?
That seems to be the case. They did add that text to the regulations at that time, which led to public speculations even back then on why that weirdly specific text was added.
By my understanding, it was more of a grey area. It seemed like the system was technically allowed according to the wording of the rule but clearly against the spirit of the rule. Prior to Miami, the FIA made it clear that they would interpret things like this as a breach of the rules, effectively allowing teams to remove them without punishment before they were caught.
The FIA is so full of shit sometimes. When Mercedes did the same with DAS, it was outlawed only for the next season, meaning Mercedes could keep its competitive advantage because nobody else was incentivized to develop the same.
Sauber (then confirmed by Vasseur) and maybe RBR had a rear wing that passed all load tests and then the FIA suddenly changed the load numbers the wings had to pass mid-season. Same with the flexing floor: It passed all the tests, everybody confirmed that a slightly flexing design (and everything flexes, otherwise it would be brittle) that such a design would be healthier for the drivers because the floor doesn't crash unto the ground all the time but still outlawed mid-season.