this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Ukraine

8225 readers
85 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW


Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms. it's not a thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

no one says hydrogen bomb referring to conventional arms.

Bold claim, considering you're posting in a thread where the article does exactly that. ๐Ÿคฃ

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

fortunately, this stupid thread doesn't encompass the rest of the ENTIRE FUCKING WORLD.

bold claim? pull your head out

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, you did say "no one". Cheer up grumpy-pants!

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

you're entirely correct, I should have stated 'no one with half a brain or a quarter of an education would make that mistake.'

appreciate the feedback.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'd also say a majority of people also don't know the term in relation to nuclear weapons either. The average person is extremely uneducated about anything nuclear. They don't know what differences between the original bombs the US dropped and modern nuclear weapons weapons might be. Even post-Oppenheimer film.

Differentiating between Nuclear and Thermonuclear weapons is something pedants in online forums do, not normies in the real world.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I completely disagree with you. A hydrogen bomb has meant nuclear weapons for 50ish years to anyone with a passing familiarity - and a whole shitton of people learned during the cold war that there were nuclear and thermonuclear weapons, they built fucking shelters in their back yards lol.

so no, disagree with you.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Well, for anecdotal proof of the average person... Since that's all we have here... both of my boomer parents that lived through the cold war, and were those children sheltering under fucking desks as of that would make a damned difference, didn't think it was related to a nuclear weapon at all.

It's a Yahoo Autos article for fucks sake, because it isn't a nuke, no one would mistake it for a nuke. Only dipshits online trying to argue because they're incapable of admitting their initial assumption of a headline didn't actually make sense in context.