this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australian News

551 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Melbourne Symphony Orchestra has cancelled a performance by an acclaimed pianist over comments he made while introducing a new piece of music dedicated to journalists killed in Gaza.

Canonical URL: https://www.smh.com.au/culture/music/orchestra-cancels-acclaimed-pianist-who-acknowledged-journalists-killed-in-gaza-20240813-p5k1we.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

A pianist whose performance was cancelled by the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra after he dedicated a new piece of music to journalists killed in Gaza says he was surprised by the response, as such introductions are “normal” practice.

Yeah that's how I understood them as well. For example, I was at a performance by The Choir of King's College Cambridge recently where they performed a piece about the massacre, displacement and forced assimilation of Indigenous Australians that had been specifically written for their Australian tour and the choir's director Daniel Hyde introduced the piece beforehand. He wasn't as explicit with his introduction, but the fact that he talked about it beforehand was very normal behaviour as far as I'm concerned. I have seen many conductors and soloists do this over the years for pieces that have been specifically written for them or by a local composer for a tour, as was the case with the piece performed by Gillham. So for the MSO to claim that the introduction was made without their authority is pretty strange to me. Have they really been reviewing every single speech prior to this? Do they really have a "no politics" policy that the soloist breached? These speeches often seem impromptu and unscripted so I doubt it. It sounds to me like the MSO is the one playing politics here.