this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1337 readers
2 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boots need shining, and Dessalines is positively salivating at the thought

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Signal was already made to hand over all the data they stored for one account at least in the US, here is a video describing how that went: https://youtu.be/3oPeIbpA5x8

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Tell me though, which company will not hand over what data they have when asked by their country's judiciary?

The question here is how much data they keep. Strict legal minimum or more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You obviously didn't watch the video

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

You are correct though, I did indeed not watch it. Hence I misunderstood the comment I was answering to as being negative towards Signal. Thanks for the added context.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Congrats if you can stand more than a minute of this 4chan-esque garbage but I'm not gonna sit through 10 minutes of it while they stretch out getting to the actual point. If you want to bring forth an argument, don't start with "watch this random ass YouTube video" where I have to sit through some garbage and have to then fact check every potential point made.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Here's what the video is based on: https://signal.org/bigbrother/cd-california-grand-jury/

I get not watching the video, I didn't, but why reply then? It's obvious you would be off the mark. Also, sometimes the description is enough to get what a video is about, here it was.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I only opened the embedded player, I didn't even bother wasting an actual click on that video. And why reply? Because they've made a stupid point about not having watched the video. That's why. If he wanted to make a point he could've cited an article with the relevant tidbits instead.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They weren't talking about your reply.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Then they should reply to whoever they meant to reply to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They were very obviously speaking about the sequence of comments in the above thread and not about you specifically.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

That makes even less sense since the previous guy did speak generally and not just about Signal.

load more comments (9 replies)