this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

32319 readers
822 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

nah I'm just not going to read a novel to respond to you. I'm giving other people I disagree with reasonable replies. Your reply is unreasonable engage with though. Feel free to try again though with a more reasonable response.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's like one page. You asked for an explanation of what's going on. Take it or leave it. Sorry it's not formatted very well I had to type it on the fly at like 3am.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Guys you can't justify a war with hundreds of thousands of deaths where one side is sending missiles at civilian buildings on the daily, it's just not going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I didin't justify anything. I just told you what happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

it's more complicated than that and you would understand why we think so if you bothered to read the explanation

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Doesn't stop you libs from trying, free the Donbas

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Here's my response. I think it's reasonable enough.

spoiler:PIGPOOPBALLS:

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't even post that. Very reasonable of you to not pay attention to basic details like who you're responding to.

Almost as if you're simply putting on a facade of open-mindedness to cover for he fact that you will not engage with any ideas more complex than "Russia bad, NATO good".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ah, sorry, you are right about getting the person wrong. The way lemmy is laid out on the app I'm using doesn't show the post before you, so I just assumed you were the same person.

In any case, that doesn't change what I said. I'm not going to read a novel then dissect it piece by piece when the premise of the entire post is "going to war and forcefully occupying a neighboring country can be justified."

I'm not saying all of Russia is bad, by the way. I admire Russia for a lot of reasons. The decision to invade their neighbor, however, cannot be justified, in the same way that the vast majority of the United States' wars cannot be justified.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In any case, that doesn't change what I said. I'm not going to read a novel then dissect it piece by piece when the premise of the entire post is "going to war and forcefully occupying a neighboring country can be justified."

US Civil War, WWII.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that post was maybe 1500 words to summarize 100+ years of regional conflict with special attention on the last 10 years written in plain language. no special jargon or references to theoretical concepts. if that's a "novel" for you, it definitely explains your grasp of this situation and affirms the critique that you are willfully ignorant and incapable of analysis beyond "russia bad." and this is why people make fun of libs like you. many libs smugly dismiss conservatives as having "simple/childlike" worldviews and value systems. then they promptly adopt their own perfectly mirrored positions and petulantly stick their fingers in their ears like you're doing here.