this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
8 points (90.0% liked)
homeassistant
11987 readers
7 users here now
Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No, because the bridge interface becomes the primary interface as far as Linux is concerned.
You'd just use dhcp to assign an IP to br0 instead of the physical ethernet device, though for a server a static IP is probably a better choice (so that it doesn't bounce around on your local network making it harder to access)
Sorry, a stupid question.
If the bridge is the primary interface on host, and the homeassistant KVM also uses this bridge, will this cause them to get the same IP again?
Thank you for your patience.
Unless there's something wonky with your virsh configuration, no.
This is a shitty explanation and if anyone would like to explain it better feel free, but the bridge interface acts as sorta like a network switch that can forward packets as well as be used for an interface, if configured.
What that means is, essentially, your VMs will be attaching their ethernet devices to a "switch" that then routes the packets out to the local LAN as if it were, well, a nic plugged into a switch.
virsh shouldn't assign an in-use MAC, as it generates a random one (and I have no idea what you'd have to do to make them not do that) so everything should... just work.