this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
356 points (99.4% liked)

Games

16742 readers
685 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And people explaining what the game is instead of how the game is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Sometimes the game itself doesn't really tell you what it is. That's not completely shocking.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is a side effect of YouTube content creation practices where a video will have an overview of the plot or story to pad out the run time or article. Often, because game journalism is basically long distance abusive relationships between the writer and the game publisher, the review is too mild to contain actual opinions and will draw on comparisons to other games instead of forming genuine critiques and admiration.

The end result is a generation of games and movies where the review is unable to provide enough genuine content to fill 10 minutes or 3 pages, so they instead spoil the game while riffing on very specific foibles. They don't know how to talk critically about mechanics or story or design.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I pretty much stopped watching videos like that. "$Game story EXPLAINED" but actually it's just a 30 minute rehash of the story without anything added to it or explained by the content "creator".

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (2 children)

A review should tell you what the game is. It should also tell you what they like/don't like about it, but different perspectives about how the core mechanics work are absolutely critical parts of the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

different perspectives about how the core mechanics work

As you said, how they work. The description already tells me what the game is and I don't need a review reciting it a la "Shadow warrior is an action adventure fps game where you play as a ninja fighting against demons"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Descriptions are useless horseshit.

A review that doesn't mention what the actual gameplay loop is is a bad review.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

To further flesh out your comment:

I recently played a small game called “Ever Forward” on the Nintendo switch. Nowhere it says that the game runs like a PowerPoint presentation. Other than that, it would be helpful if I would have read a review that said “the beautiful world you see in the trailer and screenshots is the ‘hub’ where you enter boring looking levels. The puzzles consist of 2-3 cameras that react to sound and a cube you can throw and that you need to carry to the end of each short puzzle.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Indeed, sometimes I really appreciate a heads up of if I can save in the middle of gameplay or if I have to complete a whole run before it saves progress, things like that are not deal breakers but it can definitely affect how I play a game

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's stuff like that, but it's also as simple as most game pages just not accurately depicting what the core gameplay loop is. The number of games with 10 cinematic trailers that combine for 3 seconds of gameplay and have descriptions full of setting with maybe some features but don't mention whether they're a card game or an FPS is way too high.

Screenshots can probably resolve my example, and tags are "OK", but marketing trash is just so abundant that a lot of pages are genuinely hard to figure out pretty basic elements of what the minute to minute experience is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God I hate cinematic trailers for unreleased games. It's fine if it's a released game that I can just Google gameplay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I straight up am not interested in them at all.

There are some games where I become attached to the writing, even though most are pretty mediocre and it's not why I play games. But I've never once had a story trailer interest me in any way. I will play the game if the mechanics are compelling, regardless of story. If they aren't, the story isn't better than a book or TV show and I don't care.

It's super annoying when even the screenshots are cinematic nonsense. It's a game. I want to know what the game is.