this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32081 readers
917 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Its not ilegal in russia. Legality is not a real property of things its the opinion of the guy with the biggest army in the area. Thinking otherwise is brainworms

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, annexation is illegal under the UN charter, of which Russia is a signatory, and wars of aggression are criminal in and of themselves. I'll condemn the illegal annexations performed by Israel and other states, and Russia's annexations fall under the same boat.

To be even more clear, I do think that Russia would have won fair referendums in Donetsk, Luhansk and certainly Crimea. I doubt that would have been the case for the other two oblasts. Still, all of those annexations were illegal. Just because the neo-cons have flouted the UN charter in favor of the ad hoc "rules-based order" doesn't mean others should.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's always funny seeing people post that image without the context that Palestine declared war on Israel alongside all its neighbours and attempted to push the Israeli population into the sea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The correct response to a settler colonial ethnostate being founded in your region by Britain is to try to destroy it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which excuses attempted genocide?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ending the existence of an illegitimate country built on stolen land has nothing to do with genocide. You're doing the fascist ethnostate thing where you act like a state and its people are the same thing. States come and go, people remain, the ending of a state has nothing to do with harming people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Palestinians have the stated goal of murdering the Israeli people as well as ending the Israeli state

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ending the Israeli state is not ending the people. Fuck off. 21% of the "Israeli people" are arab you fucking racist shit, but you're not including them when you say "Israeli" are you? No.

I absolutely will not apologise for calling you racist. Whether you know this fact and are saying this shit knowingly or whether you're just utterly oblivious to what the conditions are in Israel doesn't matter. Oblivious racism is still racism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i wouldnt call it an attempt, Israel is sure as hell succeeding in killing and displacing a lot of Palestinian civilians and also running the world's largest open air prison