this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
229 points (97.1% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2277 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is only profitable for a few in some places. War is not net good for "business"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ferrengi rule of acquisition 34. The best rule 34.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like the oligarch commandments.

It's like Hyperneoliberalism:

"Nothing bad ever truly happens, guilt is subjective, nothing is real, everything is allowed, but if you take anything from me, it is the worst possible crime in all of history."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In a stagflation scenario war is great for business. Otherwise you have no business at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Isn't WW2 the only example of this in practice? (and then only where the war did not reach, like the US or pre-1940 nazi germany)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ya it’s a pretty good example since WW2 was a stagflation scenario. It’s exactly the same scenario we are headed into. There’s a lot of similar polarities. Some may even argue that the next world war will break out precisely because of stagflation.

As we descend further and further into economic depression (we’ve been in a recession for years) you’ll see the gears of war begin to spool up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

One would think we'd have learned to fix this inevitability by now...or is it intentional, to "fix the stagflation"?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Part of the problem is getting everyone on board. Economic prosperity is a great way to justify keeping a government in charge. Major economic downturns usually cause a change of government and unrest with the government in general. Without a good economy as justification to keep a government in power, many governments turn to "defense" as a reason to stay in power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

The economy squeezes the proles for every penny they have, inflating the money faster than wages to ensure only the rich can afford to maintain.

Once the proles have been squeezed dry, have a major conflict and help save the failing banks and restore a "golden era" for a time.

Then do it all over again by starting to squeeze the masses.