this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
472 points (88.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2388 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you really think it’s fair for a full blown man to fight women in the ring just because he identifies as a woman?

Can you cite an example of this?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

No I can't because there's no data to go off of. I'm honestly unclear as to whether it's a valid issue or not. Even in this case where the data we have seems to indicate there's an issue, the data doesn't seem entirely trustable. Anyone claiming complete certainty in this environment with no evidence is clearly just blindly pushing an agenda in bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It seems odd that you've based multiple comments here on that example then, I think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Did you actually read said comments? I've said this multiple times. It's basically the thesis of my statements.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

They felt like concern trolling to me, but I admit I'm multitasking and posting this from next to my son's hospital bed, so maybe my reading comprehension hasn't been the best. I acknowledge that possibility.