this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk

5473 readers
4 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: their definition of "community" is quite problematic in many ways...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Interesting article. I believe it makes sense what they are saying in the big picture. Certainly, people would benefit from creating and joining local non-online communities.


What in their definition of community do you find problematic?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Mainly the focus on authorities, religion and so on. I get that they mean stability, which is probably good for children, but it is a bit too much of a projection of the "good old times" that never really existed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah, I guess this is written from a more conservative standpoint.

I believe the principal ideas from the article apply to other people as well. Like progressive people could join a local sports club for example. Keeps them healthy and fit, and provides social contacts. Or then a book club, painting club, you name it.

And well, parents can create communities around their kindergarten or school classes, or maybe also some children's sports club.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I agree. The study seems a bit biased. In the article (or the previous in the series, I forgot), a study claims that religious children say that they have trusted persons more often than secular children. I (don't) wonder how this might change if the child in question wasn't cisgender and/or heterosexual.

It is a very insightful article nonetheless. Thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

I (don’t) wonder how this might change if the child in question wasn’t cisgender and/or heterosexual.

Simple: non-cishet children quickly stop being part of religious communities, and so the religious community is very accepting to all its members. Classic survivorship bias.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

@RobotZap10000
As an athiest, I'm an active member of a Unitarian Universalist church. It gives me a community without the theology baggage. It's a win/win and super welcoming to LGBTQ+
@poVoq