this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
83 points (95.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to [email protected]

10420 readers
3 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at [email protected]

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An idea worth pursuing I guess. My first question: in case this gets forgotten about in the distant future, how could it be marked so there's a good chance of being found?

(Link to the AIBS journal article which inspired the question: https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biae058/7715645?login=false )

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (5 children)

On first hearing this sounds dumb. Any advantages the moon has are surely offset by the difficulty of getting there and maintaining/resupplying the ark.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

For very long-time, high-probability safety, the surface of the Earth is constantly being re-shaped. Whole mountains can disappear in a few million years. Floods, earthquakes, ice, weather alone.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Well... the Moon's surface is also constantly bombarded with rocks... in fact it intercepts a lot of objects that would hit Earth. For this thing to be really safe it would have to buried somewhere, not just left out in the open.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Definitely underground. The temperature swings would be wild otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Also the full force solar radiation. That's probably not good for DNA samples either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)