this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
252 points (96.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1919 readers
424 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks for clarifying.

I’m sure the idea of something being okay for some races but not for others has a name.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, it's called historical precedent. And not even historical anymore, just ask anyone in downtown Nashville.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

If you want to use historical precedent to make reductionist takes, really nobody should ever organize into any kind of group because if you dig far enough back everyone has violent, savage ancestors. History has proven that all groups of people have, at some point, done horrible things. There should be no United Nations because literally every government has a dark history. Also, how can we trust teachers (who each have had some horrible things in their ancestry) to teach our children?! Doctors should not provide care because there is a long history of systemic abuse in the field.

At least be consistent.

As for current events, maybe separate the good and the bad instead of just labeling everyone in a group bad. Historically and in the present lots of groups fought and bled for equity. You’re shitting all over it.