this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
400 points (99.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21197 readers
46 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    These days id prefer a developer produce negative lines of code without breaking anything.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

    I saw it put really well the other day. Any software has in general a set number of bugs per lines of code. Something like Debian the number of bugs goes down after release as only bugfixes occur, while anything constantly moving like a rolling release, is certain to grow in number of bugs as the less tested newer software (which generally includes more loc) is pushed. There are tradeoffs to both methods, and edge cases of course.

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

    As experience tells me, every program contains at least one bug.

    Experience also tells me, that you can remove the buggy line of code and the program will still not work as intended.

    From this follows, that every program can be reduced to a single line of code that doesn't work as intended.

    [–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

    Wasn't there a kernel release a few years back that actually resulted in less code? Or at least at some huge part?

    [–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

    I want to roll back my commits, not make more!