196

16503 readers

2034 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

241

Kang Rule (i.imgur.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

His contract said he was the only person who could play Kang in any multiverse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Did his contract say anything about getting fired for sexual assault?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Damn. If only a comic book franchise could produce a second character who was virtually identical to the first but with a slightly different outfit and mannerism. Shame that's never happened before and nobody would know how to do it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doubt

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know it's celebrity news, so might not be true but the story of his special contract clause has been around for a while now.

"During our filming, JM closed the Kang deal. I remember asking said friend about it, and they shared some details. X number of movies, X number of dollars, and more interestingly, due to the nature of the character and potential multiple versions, JM had a contract clause stating that only he could play any and all versions of Kang.”

https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/marvel-forced-keep-jonathan-majors-kang-the-conqueror-leaked-contract-shows

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I wonder if another Jonathan majors could fill the role...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Really? Disney done fucked that up. Also not enforceable as we know there was a similar contract in a parallel universe for Cuban Holding Jr. and our laws do not rule there....