this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
372 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

10940 readers
1705 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (11 children)

The squareroot of 100 is ±10.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

The square root is always positive, but you can plug it into the quadratic formula to get the two possible values.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Okay, fine the square roots of 100 are ±10.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not how the square root is defined.

You're confusing "square root of 100" with "the answer to x^2 = 100". These are different things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I differentiated between square roots and the principle square root by saying the square roots instead of the square root on the second comment.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

so you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

No, I was being pedantic to appease the pedantic assholes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nope, everything they said is well established and correct

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)