Formula 1

9038 readers

11 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location	Date
🇧🇷 Brazil	01-03 Nov
🇺🇸 United States	21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

No further action between the Verstappen and Hamilton incident (www.fia.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Stewards do not consider this to be a typical case of “changing direction under braking” although it is our determination that the driver of Car 44 could have done more to avoid the collision.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

And how TF could a dive bomb with contact like that go unpunished?

So if Lewis avoided the contact, which believe me he could have easily, should there have been no pen¿?

Lando's 2nd divebomb in Austria was very similar(with both fronts locked up and coming in way took hot) , the difference just being that verstappen opened his steering and avoided Lando. There was not even a discussion if that a dangerous move.

I find it very hypocritical that people's(including the stewards) opinion changes wildly depending on the outcome even though everybody preaches that the penalty shouldn't depend on the outcome