this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

17729 readers
8 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
1
Is there any real or serious conversation or work around the idea of a feature-full social media browser? (hachyderm.io)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Is there any real or serious conversation or work around the idea of a feature-full social media browser?

Basically something like a web browser but for “all the social media” along with useful organisation features too.

For locked down big social APIs, this makes less sense nowadays, but for open alt-social systems, *it is likely the most valuable promise of such systems* that they can become like the web, reachable through an awesome all-in-one app.

@fediverse

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The browser solves the problem of not having any open API. Each platform wants to handle things in its own way, and the browser is the perfect way to do that. Each service, including both the open and the proprietary ones, can present the feed in the way that they decide is right. The browser already does handle rudimentary account management via form auto fill, as well as a unified notification system.

But as for a unified feed... I think the best example is the issues with that come from Lemmy/Mastodon integration. Mastodon posts have a different mentality than Lemmy posts do, not to mention with structure of responses. I just don't think it does us any favors to have them share the same feed. Now we have replies that have a clear structure of who they are responding to, but Mastodon users come in adding the user tag into the comment, which is messy at best, and bordering obnoxious at worst.

But I get it, I'm not the audience you're looking to cater to. I don't particularly understand the value of RSS readers at all, because I just go directly to the services I want to see the feeds from. Hell, I don't even use bookmarks. I type in the web address for my services every time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

I don't particularly understand the value of RSS readers at all

Notifications are the value for me. I don't have to regularly check infrequently-updated sites if my RSS reader pings me whenever there's a new post. Largely a different use-case to social media though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Hell, I don’t even use bookmarks. I type in the web address for my services every time

Yea, I hear you (I don't use bookmarks either) ... but I don't think this is the average user.

I think the best example is the issues with that come from Lemmy/Mastodon integration. Mastodon posts have a different mentality than Lemmy posts do, not to mention with structure of responses.

This sounds to me like a design issue. In fact, this is kinda my point ... better interaction here, which is the "promise" of the fediverse, may be best addressed with good aggregating clients rather than relying on too platforms to work out their historical differences over the protocol.